Veracity?

Is science-fiction Big-Three Member (Robert Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, ACC) author Arthur C. Clarke a pedophile?

Did he leave the UK for Colombo, Sri Lanka due to his diving proclivities or others? Unawares: Sri Lanka happens to be the global capital for boy prostitutes.

Noted:

[1] In 1953, Clarke married Marilyn Mayfield, an American. The relationship ended a mere 6 months later. Though Clarke is generally unwilling to discuss his sexuality, on this matter he explained: “The marriage was incompatible from the beginning. It was sufficient proof that I wasn’t the marrying type, although I think everybody should marry once.”

SciFi saint or closet refusist?

Arthur C. Clarke was in the news. Just days before he was due to be knighted by Prince Charles the reactionary old science fiction writer and ‘futurist’ had confessed to being a common pederast, preying on the impoverished boys of Sri Lanka, where he had lived like some sort of honoured cultural icon and patron saint of ’sex tours’ for four decades. I had always wondered why he moved there and now the old bastard had just blurted it out.

Weigh in.

BZ

Happy Alice Day

This is tough work we do, isn’t it? I think it’s time we all took a breather. So kick back and help us as we celebrate the Anti’s hijacking of Alice Day.

If you’d like to see more visit HEREand HERE and HERE

Thank you to all the Anti’s!

Alice Day Facts

April 25. Alice Day. A day created by heterosexual pedophiles to celebrate the abuse and exploitation of little girls. So named for Alice Liddell who inspired Lewis Carroll’s monumental work Alice In Wonderland in 1862. It was a story Carroll created for Alice while rowing her and her sisters in a rowboat.

The innuendo child molesters drew from this: Carroll had to be a pedophile! Alice must’ve been the object of his desire! She belongs to us! No man could tell a child a story simply to entertain her, NO that’s not possible!

Of course, the fact that Carroll photographed Alice only compounds the pedophile delusions.

What they don’t want you to know however is the most important part of the Carroll/Liddell story. Here are a few of the highlights:

• Fact: It is a myth that Alice was Carroll’s “favorite” photographic model. There is no evidence of this.
• Fact: Carroll often entertained women in his rooms at the University….some were married. This was against every social standard and many would be damaged if this information came to light.
• Fact: Carroll’s heirs purposefully promulgated the myth of Carroll as the blundering social misfit who was not comfortable around adults. They could not afford for the truth to come to light so they destroyed the entries in his diary that would’ve explained Carroll’s split with the Liddell family.
• Fact: In the late 1800’s in England, adoration of children did not raise eyebrows. Entertaining married women in private quarters and owning a collection of adult porn when you’re a Reverend did.
• Fact: There is no evidence that Carroll felt anything stronger than friendship for Alice. Repeat: NO evidence that Carroll was a pedophile in general or that he had feelings for Alice specifically.
• Fact: ALL evidence suggests that Carroll was actually just a normal person and the myth that he was a pedophile is the means the family used to hide the deep, dark family secret…..that Carroll was an adulterer at worst.
• Fact: Carroll took Alice’s older brother Harry out on the same rowboat years before Alice. This was not a romantic encounter but something Carroll had been doing to entertain the Liddell family for years before he ever took Alice.

The family hid his secrets hoping to protect his reputation. Unfortunately they unwittingly played into the hands of an even more sinister gang than British aristocracy – pedophiles.

Indeed if all available evidence is considered in context then this day to celebrate the love of Carroll’s would more aptly be named Lorina Day for Alice’s mother.

Of course fans and scholars alike have recognized that there is no evidence Carroll was a pedophile. But there’s always a *certain* kind of person who will just never get it.

The myth that Carroll was a pedophile is only that – a myth. So much so that it even has a name (The Carroll Myth). Google the phrase, examine the evidence and decide for yourself.

Link to this post!
</p> <p><a href="http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/04/alice-day-facts.html"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m314/absolutezeroteam/Alice05.png" border="0" alt="Alice Day Facts" width="175" /></a><br />

Happy Alice Day

Enjoy and be sure to check out:

http://lindsay-ashford.blogspot.com/
http://johnathan-mathias-doe.blogspot.com/
http://human-face-of-pedophilia.blogspot.com/

Happy Alice Day.

Alice Day Facts

April 25. Alice Day. A day created by heterosexual pedophiles to celebrate the abuse and exploitation of little girls. So named for Alice Liddell who inspired Lewis Carroll’s monumental work Alice In Wonderland in 1862. It was a story Carroll created for Alice while rowing her and her sisters in a rowboat. The innuendo child molesters drew from this: Carroll had to be a pedophile! Alice must’ve been the object of his desire! She belongs to us! No man could tell a child a story simply to entertain her, NO that’s not possible! Of course, the fact that Carroll photographed Alice only compounds the pedophile delusions.What they don’t want you to know however is the most important part of the Carroll/Liddell story. Here are a few of the highlights:

• Fact: It is a myth that Alice was Carroll’s “favorite” photographic model. There is no evidence of this.
• Fact: Carroll often entertained women in his rooms at the University….some were married. This was against every social standard and many would be damaged if this information came to light.
• Fact: Carroll’s heirs purposefully promulgated the myth of Carroll as the blundering social misfit who was not comfortable around adults. They could not afford for the truth to come to light so they destroyed the entries in his diary that would’ve explained Carroll’s split with the Liddell family.
• Fact: In the late 1800’s in England, adoration of children did not raise eyebrows. Entertaining married women in private quarters and owning a collection of adult porn when you’re a Reverend did.
• Fact: There is no evidence that Carroll felt anything stronger than friendship for Alice. Repeat: NO evidence that Carroll was a pedophile in general or that he had feelings for Alice specifically.
• Fact: ALL evidence suggests that Carroll was actually just a normal person and the myth that he was a pedophile is the means the family used to hide the deep, dark family secret…..that Carroll was an adulterer at worst.
• Fact: Carroll took Alice’s older brother Harry out on the same rowboat years before Alice. This was not a romantic encounter but something Carroll had been doing to entertain the Liddell family for years before he ever took Alice.

The family hid his secrets hoping to protect his reputation. Unfortunately they unwittingly played into the hands of an even more sinister gang than British aristocracy – pedophiles.Indeed if all available evidence is considered in context then this day to celebrate the love of Carroll’s would more aptly be named Lorina Day for Alice’s mother. Of course fans and scholars alike have recognized that there is no evidence Carroll was a pedophile. But there’s always a *certain* kind of person who will just never get it. The myth that Carroll was a pedophile is only that – a myth. So much so that it even has a name (The Carroll Myth). Google the phrase, examine the evidence and decide for yourself.

The family hid his secrets hoping to protect his reputation. Unfortunately they unwittingly played into the hands of an even more sinister gang than British aristocracy – pedophiles. Indeed if all available evidence is considered in context then this day to celebrate the love of Carroll’s would more aptly be named Lorina Day for Alice’s mother.Of course fans and scholars alike have recognized that there is no evidence Carroll was a pedophile. But there’s always a *certain* kind of person who will just never get it. The myth that Carroll was a pedophile is only that – a myth. So much so that it even has a name (The Carroll Myth). Google the phrase, examine the evidence and decide for yourself.

Lindsay Slipped ~ Oops

Is anyone here aware of the new effort against Lindsay Ashford? Petra Luna is calling for search engines to de-list Lindsay. (Hey Lindsay, here’s a clue…..they can). Petra went on KTRH Newsradio and was interviewed by Scott Braddock concerning this effort. You can listen to it HERE

Scott also interviewed Lindsay. You can listen to it at the same location….if you can stomach it. It was mostly just more of the same old nauseating drivel that emanates from the words and writings of this sick twisted sissy-man. But there were a few things from the interview that I wanted to make note of. Let’s start here:

Scott: Do you think that children who have any type of sex with adults grow up to be well adjusted?

Lindsay: I think that some do.

Scott: Do you know of any?

Lindsay: I know of people who had sexual encounters when they were elementary school age children.

Scott: And you think they’re alright?

Lindsay: I think they’re fine.

Let’s stop there and first look at his one-time partner Todd Nickerson. Todd was molested as a small boy, I believe it was a fondling episode. To this day he can’t come to terms with it. “Did the man care for me?” He still asks himself. Well, Todd, I’m sorry to say, that no, no the man did not care for you. He merely groped you, that’s what perverts do. When you go on one of your rants, when you’re confused and tormented by it…….you are asking the wrong people for advice when you go to GirlChat for answers. They are perverts! What do you expect? Perhaps you should try writing a survivor letter to your abuser instead.

As for Lindsay, he failed to tell Scott Braddock that he himself was molested by his babysitter when he was 4 years old. He failed to tell Scott about how he never told anyone, how it tormented him and he thought of it as a trauma, how screwed up it made him when he was going through puberty. He failed to tell Scott about his multiple suicide attempts and his bipolar disorder. His multiple hospitalizations in mental institutions and how he is still not alright to this very day. Yeah he left off that part. But, moving on….

Scott: So there should be no laws regarding people who for example do what most people consider to be molestation of children?

Lindsay: I think that there should be laws against any form of sexual contact which are obtained by force, coercion,manipulation or deception.

What? Lindsay agrees! There should be no deception! Then what do you call all that rubbish on your website, Lindsay? All those twisted and skewed academic articles? The twisting of Ken Lanning for example, and gosh darn even the DOJ report, you’ve screwed that up too! How do you explain the ethics behind manipulation of facts for the purpose of deceiving people, which is in turn to create some sort of change of opinion about you and yours?

How do you explain your actions? That’s not honesty…..so why would you feel people should take what you say seriously and believe you when you say that you wouldn’t harm a child under any circumstances when your entire website is a purposeful misrepresentation? Why should they believe you when you say that a child who was abused wasn’t really abused? Or when you say your website is not hosted in the Evil Empire then try to claim free speech protection under the American Constitution? Why should they trust you to be a fine, up-standing man when you post what you know to be a form letter from StC….which they rescinded…and you leave it there when they request it be removed and your sole purpose is to deceive people into believing that StC endorses you?

Why should they feel anything other than repugnance when they see you mock society….or children who were abused, or murdered? You are a walking, talking, breathing LIE, Lindsay Ashford. You are dishonest, unethical, calculating, malicious, and unconscionable. But there’s more:

Lindsay: I think that so long as there is consent and respect that children should be allowed to….

Scott: Do you think that a 5 year old grasps what’s going on well enough to be able to consent to sexual activity?

Lindsay: A 5 year old understands friendship. A 5 year old understands affection.

Scott: So can a 2 year old?

Lindsay: A 2 year old understands pleasure.

Scott: So they can consent to sex?

Lindsay: They can consent to pleasurable activity

Scott: Can a 6 month old do that?

Lindsay: I’m sure that 6 months old also have nerve endings and understanding and an understanding of what is pleasurable to them, yes

Scott: So a 6 month old can consent to sex

Lindsay: A 6 month old can consent to activity that it finds pleasurable

Scott: And so you don’t understand why you get death threats?

There you have it. A condensed version, but if you can bear it go listen to the entire thing. Let’s see what the girl chatters had to say about their hero

Hayaku: She should get the hell of the internet. The last frontier of free speech, and a very exciting one, and a bunch of mentally ill christofascist bitches with nothing better to do than make stupid petitions and complaints try and spoil it all.

albertross: lindsay – you hit every ball home – i could almost believe your interviewer was feeding you lines from a script – he was classic, and you walked him smack into every wall on the court. well played, sir – absolutely impeccable.

Was he listening to the same interview I was??

Elminster: You’re my fucking hero, dude! You have balls the size of Jupiter!

Student: Aside from being articulate, you have a delightful accent, man.

LOL, read more about that here.

“The Brits are really surprised when I say I’m
American, because my accent is really good, so
I’d say that I’m the second American who can pull it off.”

For the record, he’s from San Francisco and if you listen carefully you’ll hear him slip sometimes when he’s talking. Some things you can only fake for so long, in fact he did it in this interview.

Student: That 6-month-old baby he threw at you was uncalled for. I suppose he was just trying to trip you up and test you for consistency, but it certainly drove down the amount of rational thought going on in his listening audience, which was already pretty low. Lindsay, you have Balls of Titanium

Hierophant: I was almost in tears luaghing at the Texas radio host.

Trucker: TOOT TOOT!!! (NT)

Hayaku: More nutjobs that make no sense fighting us. Makes us look like the smart ones.

SUNDAYS AND CYBELE: cant wait for judgement day and the 2nd coming. BURN ANTI’S BURN!

Febri-chan: God bless puellula and Mr. Ashford until and beyond the end of the world!

Norbert: Who made a better case?

LOL I believe that was a rhetorical question.

Child Advocates

Slimeball pedophile activist Samuel Raven recently touched on how pedophiles are advocates for children’s rights:

Next to the pedophile, perhaps equal with the pedophile, children are are being sexually abused by the fact that society will not allow a child any form of sexual power or voice, thus deeming every child a victim of his or her own sexual awareness.
This IS the REAL child sex abuse that must be articulated, and I am here to help in this endeavor

How very noble and selfless of him – odd though the way I’ve never heard anyone complain about how they were sexually abused by society as a child for not being molested by a pedophile.

From the victims of child abuse I have meet, PEOPLE that have dealt with the kind of relationships Raven is advocating first hand. They’d say that Raven here, advocating for “rights” of children to be molested and abused, is like Adolf Hitler advocating for the “rights” of the Jewish people to be exterminated.

Albertross

“What am I getting at here…..I’m trying to say that I don’t think there’s going to be any huge revelation here, I don’t think there’s going to be any glorious dramatic change in society. I think that this is just one of those things that just gradually change until you don’t realize it has changed….it sort of sneaks up on you.”

So begins the “final battle” of Albert Ross. But what exactly is the goal of his war? Is it acceptance and tolerance? Is it the ability to upload videos to youtube without the militia knocking down his door, er I mean his plastic? Is it merely a tribute to ‘Alice Day’ the pedo holiday of perversions? Or is it something more sinister? Let’s listen to more and see….

“So what does this mean? What it means to me is this idea if only we could have a little more courage and felt a little easier about the support we do have and confident….they wouldn’t be able to stand against us. The measures that are being taken in parts of the US in particular and England and other places are very seriously unconstitutional. They are really pushing the limits of what any society is or should be permitted to do for a segment of the population and that must change. Right now it won’t change because the people who are pushing these agendas have almost free reign still it is very difficult for those in our position to stand up and make a clearer argument.”

Here we go again. Let’s repeat ….not every country has legislated free speech, Albert. Sorry to burst your bubble but even England is not protected under OUR constitution. Neither are you as a matter of fact. You see, James, the American Constitution doesn’t extend to Sechelt, British Columbia. But let’s continue….

“It is one thing to point at what’s wrong with the measures being applied here but that sort of gets washed away when the people pushing the measures…go ‘well its to protect the children…obviously we have to take extreme measures because there’s an extreme danger here’. That’s bullshit. There is no extreme danger. There’s never been an extreme danger. There have been cases there are incidents but its never been as serious as people would like to believe.”

Hmmm… 1 out of 6 children will be molested every year? Or whatever statistic you choose to use……..I just can’t help but wonder how many it would take for James to consider it a problem. Oh wait, I forgot…..he thinks they are all consensual.

“……..you’re gonna hate this……..you’re gonna scream at me…….but when I think of Girl Chat, I think of you guys…..forgive me…..as dwarves sitting there in your smelly little cave….your vast layers of terrified security discussing bravely the horrible terror that you live in. Yes, I know it is horrible and yes I know it is a terror. But, oh boy, if only we could just accept that we have a right and we’d be there, and all of this wouldn’t be a problem. It’s beautiful, because if we could, if we could actually just be……..

…….what’s left of the damaged ones, the hurt ones, the people who do want to kill us, the people will in fact present a threat to us…….there aren’t that many of them. Perverted Justice for instance is not a huge organization, it’s way tinier than any of our forums. It’s a bunch of really not very bright people and they won’t show up very well in front of the general public. You know if it came down to an argument in public between us and them – we’d win. There’s no question that we’d carry the day under those circumstances. What they’re doing can’t stand the light of reason, so what I guess I’m trying to say is that we’re actually helping to keep the darkness in place by the way we’re acting and the difficulty of course is that it’s safe what we’re doing. It’s not much of a life but it’s safe and we don’t have to worry too much as long as we’re careful. We’re not gonna get hurt. But, what are we losing, what are we giving away in exchange for that? So it’s not something I can advise anyone else to do. I’ve taken the step for myself and I wanted to find out…..I got sick of being caught in this dark space and find out what the reality was and…..Come on out, man, the water’s fine.”

The water is indeed fine because, you see, AlbertRoss is getting smaller and smaller. First he gave us glimpses of his lean-to with the plastic walls, the high-speed internet and the garbage on the floor. Then he tried redecorating by hanging sheets behind him. Then he crawled off into the corner and said it was for protection from the elements. Perhaps that’s why he smokes continuously in the little closed box……….it’s his heat source. But now, he’s showing less and less of himself until his most recent video, of which there’s been about 40 so far, you can only see his eyes. Pretty soon the only thing that will remain is a black screen.

To all the little dwarves in their smelly little caves………Come out, come out wherever you are!

Local (ACLU) lawyer permanently disbarred for child-sex online chats

Monday, April 16, 2007
By MICHAELANGELO CONTE

JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

Chatting online about sex with someone he believed was a 12-year-old boy has earned a Jersey City lawyer permanent disbarment in New Jersey, officials said.

The disbarment is the result of a guilty plea by Steven C. Cunningham to one count of attempted endangerment of the welfare of a child, an act that “reflects adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer,” according to the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics.

On three separate occasions between September and October 2004, Cunningham chatted online via his home computer in Jersey City with a person he believed to be a 12-year-old boy, officials said. In reality, it was an undercover Passaic County investigator.

During the sessions, Cunningham “described, in lurid detail, certain sexual acts that he hoped to perform on the boy,” court papers said.

“He also described sex acts that he hoped to teach the boy to perform on him, inviting the child to ‘get together in New York,’” according to the documents.

Cunningham pleaded guilty to the charges Dec. 13, 2005, and was sentenced to parole supervision for the rest of his life, court papers say.
A similar case in 2002 resulted in a one-year suspension for another lawyer, but the state Supreme Court instead ordered disbarment for life, saying society’s view of such crimes is more harsh today.

“These rules change as society change and the court is obviously viewing them as among the most serious violations an attorney can commit,” said David E. Johnson Jr., director of the Office of Attorney Ethics. “This is a very serious matter and the court imposed the most serious discipline.”
Cunningham had no prior record nor prior attorney ethics charges, officials said. The disbarment only affects his status to practice law in New Jersey; authorities said he also is licensed to practice law in New York, but Johnson said his office is notifying authorities there.

Cunningham could not be reached at his Jersey City residence for comment.

Court papers say he was employed by the American Civil Liberties Union in New York, but officials at that office did not immediately return calls.

DUNT, DUNT, DUNT… ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST!

A Little Bit of Respect

I’ve always wondered whether the girls pictured on the main page of the pedophile hang out “GirlChat” would appreciate having their faces broadcasted out as sexual objects to one of the largest audiences of pedophiles on the internet.

I would have at least thought the scumbags that run GirlChat would have givin it a little more consideration, especially in regards to heated topic of the board.

It comes down to the fact that these self labeled “Childlovers” really don’t have all that much respect or consideration for the rights and welfare of children at all.